September 2007 Newsletter - Volume
20, Issue 1
|
From the President
As your new president, I would first like to acknowledge
and thank the 2006-2007 Directors for their time and effort
given to the DWLS. Similarly, I want to thank the members
of the new Board for volunteering their time to our organization
(in particular those who will be serving both years). Special
recognition needs to be made to Dominic and Tony Holmes
and Eleice Wickham for their continued service and dedication
to DWLS.
The current energy boom brings with it a unique set of
problems, including (but not limited to) understaffing,
inexperienced staff, log QC, and petrophysical models in
complex geology/mineralogy. Our common goal is the understanding
of well logs and core, and the interpretation of these data
to define hydrocarbons. The DWLS has always been directed
to the advancement of the science of petrophysics through
the education of its members. In order to meet the challenges
noted above, this year the DWLS is providing its membership:
- One day short courses in the fall and in the spring
(see our website for details)
- Monthly speakers whose topics are heavily weighted
towards topics of log interpretation and petrophysical
models
We hope that you take the opportunity to join us at these
scheduled events and capitalize upon the networking and
discussions that accompany our gatherings.
|
|
From the Vice President - Technology
Jack Bowler
Bowler Petrophysics, Inc.
My major goal this year was to line up all 9 speakers
before the year starts and that has been achieved. Additionally
we have two backup speakers to cover in a last minute emergency
(heavy spring snowfall?).
A secondary goal is to have a heavy emphasis on geology
because I have noticed that such talks seem to draw more
attendees. Several presentations meet that goal although
the talk title may not make that clear.
DWLS would like to thank all the speakers for volunteering
to talk and for their efforts in presenting their ideas
and knowledge to the DWLS community. It takes time to put
a presentation together and who has much of that these days.
The first three talks deal with tight gas sands - a subject
of great interest to many. Both operators developing tight
gas sands and explorers looking for by-passed tight gas
sands are going to like these three presentations.
Lesley Evans will lead off on September 18th
with her talk on Magnetic Imaging Results in the
Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, CO. This
talk was a "sell out" at RMAG and now those who missed out
will have a chance to hear it. Lesley may have modified
her RMAG talk if time allowed so even if you heard it the
first time be sure to catch it again. That is what I plan
to do.
Steve Cumella will follow on October 16th
with Open-Hole or Cased-Hole Logs in Tight Gas Sands?.
As you know there are more and more pulsed neutron logs
being run in the Rocky Mountain tight gas sands. It will
be very interesting to hear Steve's take on this subject
as he has a lot of tight gas sand experience.
On November 20, our President, Dick Merkel, will discuss
Using Core Data to Develop and Calibrate Petrophysical
Models in Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs. Bring
your pencil and notebook because over the years Dick has
presented DWLS with ideas that can be used in our work.
Lastly, DWLS would like to thank Bob Eaton and Dominic
Holmes for their creative speaker's gift idea.
|
|
From the Vice President - Membership
Bill Rodgers
Weatherford International
It's time once again to get your membership dues paid
up. Here's a membership form you can fill out and
send with your payment to me at:
Bill Rodgers
DWLS VP Membership
c/o
Weatherford International
410 17th St,
Suite 400
Denver, CO 80202
Or bring your filled out form along with payment to the
September meeting.
If you are already a lifetime member, you may want to
fill out an update
form if any of your contact information may have
changed in the last year.
|
|
DWLS Fall Workshop – Clay Minerals and Their Effect
on the Electrical Behavior of Shaly Sands
Jack Bowler
Bowler Petrophysics, Inc.
DWLS and SPWLA members, the Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas
community and others from various universities are in for
a treat this autumn when E. C. Thomas presents this one-day
course 19 October 2007 at the Colorado School of Mines.
This is a unique opportunity to hear one of the shaly sand
pioneers and original thinkers present his ideas on a problem
that anyone who looks at wire-line logs needs to understand.
Resistivity contrast between oil and gas zones and water
zones has been the main means of identifying hydrocarbons
since the inception of wire-line logs. Clay minerals
can reduce that contrast and make hydrocarbon identification
more difficult.
E. C. starts his course with the Periodic Chart of the
Elements and works his way through clay mineral structures
and winds up with methods to deal with the Clay Minerals
problem. Not only is the course informative but his
"brain teasers" sprinkled throughout the course keep one
alert and are pretty amusing.
How do I know? I attended the sold-out course at
the recent Austin SPWLA meeting and already have my check
in to attend a second time at CSM. The course fee
is heavily subsidized by DWLS resulting in very low cost
to DWLS members (must be paid up as of May 2007).
Don't procrastinate. Get your check in today.
See the announcement
for additional details.
|
|
From the Editor
As you can see, I have changed little in the format of
the newsletter this year. Mostly due to just being
too busy to play around with it. The email reminders
have been simplified for various reasons, although the content
is identical.
I am always open to suggestions and comments on the design,
content, and email reminders from the members. That
goes for the website too. Drop me an
email if you have any thoughts on ways we can improve
things to make it better or easier for you.
Finally, just a quick reminder that
Bill Rodgers is handling the membership roster again
this year. If you need to change your email address,
or update your contact information in any way, please contact
him directly.
|
"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results
in the Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, CO"
Lesley W. Evans
Williams E & P
This talk is a replay of the presentation given to RMAG
on May 18th, 2007.
Further emphasis on MRIL T1 and T2 modeled tool responses
and further
integration of Williams Fork Fm. rock types with NMR data
will be given.
In 2004 Williams Exploration and Production began a comprehensive
test well
program to better identify pay in the Williams Fork Fm.,
Piceance Basin
Colorado. To achieve this goal, six wells were chosen in
the Grand Valley,
Parachute and Rulison fields for magnetic resonance image
logs, standard open
hole logs and production logs. While our initial goal was
one of pay and non-
pay identification, magnetic resonance image logs also provided
interesting
insights into the pore structure at the top of continuous
gas, as well as rock
type changes within the continuous gas cell. By combining
these data with
previously obtained magnetic resonance image logs, regional
pore size
variations were seen. Highlights from the test wells will
be shown and a
brief overview of our practical experience with magnetic
resonance logs will
be given.
|
About the Speaker
Lesley Evans is a petrophysicist with Williams E&P in
Denver where she is
working the Piceance Basin, CO. Much of her career has been
spent working
tight gas plays in the Rockies, as she has also worked with
Amoco Production
Company and Schlumberger. She is a member of SPE, RMAG and
DWLS. Lesley
holds a BA from Rice University in Geology and Geophysics,
a MSc from the U.
Colorado, Boulder in Geology, an MBA from Erasmus University
in Rotterdam, NL
and she is a graduate of Amoco's Petrophysics Program, Class
30.
|
|
Chapter Statistics
|
Statistic
|
This Year
|
3-Year
Ave.
|
# of Active
members |
195 |
171 |
# that are
New members |
0 |
50 |
# that are
Students |
9 |
9 |
# that are
Lifetime Members |
65 |
55 |
September luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
65 |
October luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
44 |
November luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
39 |
December luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
41 |
January luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
55 |
February luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
31 |
March luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
37 |
April luncheon
meeting attendance |
|
27 |
May luncheon meeting
attendance |
|
? |
|
|