2018 Spring Workshop
Core Analysis
The Denver Well Logging Society invites you to attend our
2018 Spring workshop being held Tuesday, April 10th, 2018 at the Colorado School of Mines.
Overview:
In continuation of the DWLS' workshop tradition, this
spring's
workshop, Core Analysis, will
be held from 7:30 am to 5:00 pm on Tuesday, April 10th
at the Colorado School of Mines.
Join us for an all-day workshop focusing on how to interpret
core data in conventional and unconventional reservoirs.
Instructors:
When:
Tuesday, April 10th, 2018
7:30 AM - 5 PM
Where:
Student Center (1600 Maple St)
Colorado School of Mines
Golden, CO
Registration:
Reservations for non-DWLS members is $225, and can be made by clicking here:
DWLS members in good standing as of
January 1st
and students are eligible for a discount -
you should have
received a special email or flyer with this discount
information. If you are unemployed, you
may contact us about a discounted rate.
To pay by check contact Dominic Holmes at
or call 303-770-4235.
Payment must be received no later than Tuesday, March 20th, 2018; after
that date, we will release your space reservation. Reservations
must be made in advance, walk-ins will not
be admitted!
If paying by check, make it out to the DWLS, and mail it to
(checks must be received by March
20th):
Dominic Holmes
Digital Formation, Inc.
Attn: DWLS Spring Workshop
999 18th Street, Suite 2410
Denver, CO 80202
Cancellations:
Cancellations with a full refund can be made up until the
March 20th deadline by contacting Dominic. After
that date, no refunds will be made, however, you may send
someone else as your replacement (please notify us beforehand).
Abstracts:
20MHz NMR Core Analysis Value
Harry Xie (Core Lab)
Because of its great sensitivity to solid organics and other
advantages, high frequency (20MHz) NMR core analysis has been
applied extensively to unconventional mudstones and gained
market acceptance in the oil and gas industry. The high
frequency NMR correlation time plots, e.g. the T1-T2 Mapping
techniques, have the sensitivity and resolution in the
relaxation time space to detect and quantify all liquids and
solids that contain hydrogen in mudstones. The state of art high
frequency NMR core analysis techniques are utilized in two ways
in order to study petrophysical and petrochemical properties of
unconventional core samples: (1) static measurements to quantify
liquid porosities, liquid saturations, and solid/immobile
organics; (2) dynamic measurements under reservoir conditions to
study changes of each constituent due to temperature, pressure
and fluid flow in the sample. This talk presents the technical
advantages of high frequency NMR compared to conventional low
frequency (2 MHz or lower) NMR. Typical NMR 2-D maps from
various shale formations will be shown with emphasis on
quantifying water and organics together with comparisons with
traditional Dean Stark analysis and Rock-Eval pyrolysis. The
dynamic NMR measurements reveal that solid organics in the
unconventional formations play a key role in oil and gas
generation and production.
Reservoir Performance in Unconventional Reservoirs, the EOR Requirement
Derek Beckett/Ted Griffin (Core Lab)
Reservoir performance evaluation in liquids producing shale
reservoirs is, to say the least, unconventional. So little is
yet fully understood and conventional wisdom may be sufficiently
misleading to be inappropriate. As an example, diffusion
coefficients in nano-scale pores may be remarkably pessimistic
and consideration need be given to in situ, experimental
investigation. Experimentation to determine recovery under
primary depletion requires restoration of pore pressure and
effective stress without catastrophic consequence, establishing
reservoir temperature and restoring the saturation state with
live reservoir fluids before performance testing can commence.
In permeable reservoirs this reconstruction is trivial.
Additional, incremental recovery under gas cycling following
primary depletion can be economically significant and simulation
of this process in the laboratory can provide recovery
characteristics. The testing regimen normally includes
reservoir fluid phase behavior, condensation/vaporization &
miscibility study followed by injection/production profiling.
This presentation includes EOR (gas cycling) recovery
improvement, diffusion considerations, permeability stress
dependence manifested during production/injection phases and
visualization of pore space and fluid distribution using high
frequency NMR and microCT scanning.
Lessons Learned in Permian Core Analysis: Comparison Between Retort, GRI, and Routine Methodologies
Aiden Blount (Shell)
In today's competitive cost environment, core acquisition and
analysis is too often dismissed as unaffordable. This forces
petrophysicists to make every dollar count in core evaluation.
Tough choices have to be made-many people chase the lowest bid,
least expensive methodologies, reduced oversight, and less
sampling. In this paper, insights will be shared from a
comprehensive round-robin study directly comparing the results
of the most common techniques (GRI/Retort/RCA) used by major
vendors. Understanding differences in techniques early in an
evaluation process can help efficiently direct technical
spending.
As with many comparison studies, this project started with
the reconciliation of analysis sourced from different
laboratories using different methodologies.
There was a significant business driver to this work as we
noticed differences in measured porosity and fluid saturations
that contribute to significant differences, approximately 25%,
in hydrocarbon pore volume among vendors using alternative
techniques. These differences directly impact log calibration
objectives as well as estimations of hydrocarbons in place.
We began to ask a series of simple questions: Should we use
crushed samples or routine core plugs? What is the impact of
analytical technique on the results? What role does lithology
and organic content play in the results from different
analytical techniques? What is the role of sample size? What is
the variability between vendors for identical procedures? If
there is variability, what is the apparent cause?
A set of 10 twin samples of Permian Bone Spring formation
from the Delaware Basin in Texas and New Mexico was evaluated
using a variety of laboratory derived measurements, including
X-ray diffraction (XRD), total organic carbon (TOC)/RockEval,
retort, and Dean Stark/Gas Research Institute (GRI) protocol
analyses from two labs and RCA from one lab. These 10 samples
were selected to represent varying lithofacies with a range of
organic, mineralogical, and water/oil content. The level of
oversight at each data source was also tracked.
Through detailed analysis of the raw data from these
measurements, we address the questions above. With these
results, we hope to (1) maximize every dollar spent in core
analysis, (2) focus oversight where it is truly required, and
(3) accurately and consistently evaluate the core analysis in
the Permian play for fast and value-driven business decisions.
GRI Porosity Issues; Integration of GRI with NMR
Mark Sutcliffe (Council Oaks)
TBA
Strategies for Estimating Lithofacies, RQ, and HC in Non-Cored Wells Using Cored Wells
Eric Eslinger (eGAMLS Inc)
Main Points
- Probabilistic multi-well MVCA (multi-variate cluster
analysis) is used to discriminate, classify, and correlate
rock types (~lithofacies) into electroclasses.
- The clustering variables typically used are
standard well logs (RHOB, NPHI, GR, + PEF, + log RT …).
- Wells used in a multi-well MVCA can include both
cored and non-cored wells.
- Mixed type clustering variables (e.g., well logs
plus core plug data) can be used. When this is done, an
essential pre-clustering task is an accurate, variable
core-to-log depth correction. Also, when this is done, a
by-product (in addition to the actual clustering results) is
predictions for missing or nulled core data within which the
predicted results are inherently upscaled due to the
differing scales of the log and core data.
- The MVCA procedure requires that all samples be
assigned an initial starting classification. This process
is termed “initialization”. Unlike a back propagation neural
net where only a few samples are selected for
initialization, all samples - except those that are nulled -
are used for initialization and all samples are used during
the iterative MVCA. This initialization process is important
as the goal is to begin the assignments (viz., the a priori
classification) as close to the perceived “answer” as
possible. Initialization is termed “unsupervised” when there
is little upfront information on the actual rock
classification (e.g., there is no whole core data to permit
a preliminary sedimentologic description). Initialization is
termed “supervised” when there is some core data that can be
used to develop a preliminary sedimentologic description.
- Ideally, the best initialization procedure is to use a
whole core sedimentologic description for initialization of
the MVCA. There are special challenges (to be discussed)
when doing this, particularly for thin-bedded rock
sequences.
- At conclusion of a MVCA that has used unsupervised
initialization, an “expert system” is used to assign the
resulting electroclasses to likely rock types (e.g.,
clastics or carbonates, and their likely sub-types (Ss,
Sltstn, Sh, Ls, Ds …). This classification can be updated
when additional information (e.g., additional wells or core
data) is obtained.
- A mineralogy-based forward-modeling routine
permits determination of mean mineralogy of each
electroclass, and the specific mineralogy of each sample for
each electroclass is determined using the probability
assignments from the MVCA. During this modeling process, the
number of minerals used is not restricted to the number of
well logs used during clustering. The modeling process
generates profiles for TPOR, EPOR, Swt, Swe, plus additional
parameters using a mineralogy petrophysical properties
"look-up" table plus a series of empirical equations with
outputs constrained by selected logical criteria. A model
is developed for the “best” cored well, and the inputs saved
and then applied to non-cored wells.
- In a multi-well MVCA, the model electroclasses translate
and correlate among wells. Additional wells can be added to
the multi-well Project as they are drilled.
- More detailed (enhanced) modeling is possible when
a downhole elemental spectroscopy log is available along
with sufficient and accurate XRD (or FTIR) core data such
that the stoichiometric conversion of elemental data to
mineralogic data can be calibrated using the core mineralogy
data. Such analysis results can be translated to non-cored
wells included in the multi-well MVCA.
- A less robust but much faster multi-well "quick
look" analysis for electroclass-based TPOR and Swt can be
implemented. This procedure is also dependent on the results
of a multi-well probabilistic MVCA. Ideally, this procedure
can be calibrated using results from the more robust
mineralogy-based forward-modeling analysis.
Fluid Typing with Core NMR
Ravinath Viswanathan (Schlumberger)
TBA
Automated Cuttings Analysis for Risk Evaluation and Reservoir Characterization
Don Hall (Schlumberger)
Cuttings are an underutilized resource in the petroleum
industry. They are an unavoidable byproduct of the drilling
process, are available from the entire penetrated section, and
are relatively inexpensive to collect and archive. As
exploration focus changes, cuttings from legacy wells can be
obtained from whatever stratigraphic section is of current
interest, in contrast to core. Given the relatively high
percentage of horizontal drilling in resource plays, and the
difficulties in obtaining cores or comprehensive logs from
laterals, it is important to collect as much information as
possible from the rock material that is inevitably produced.
Automated instrumentation has been developed for
characterization of rock-fluid systems whereby large numbers of
cuttings or other rock samples are conveyed sequentially through
a series of analyzers including: high-resolution ultraviolet and
visible light photography, trapped fluid analysis by direct
quadrupole mass spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence analysis, and
diffuse-reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy
(DRIFTS). All analyses are performed on the same 0.5g rock
sample, thereby preserving interrelationships between rock and
fluid, and allowing for multiple data sets to be collected on
limited sample volumes. The entire multi-stage analytical cycle
lasts 5 days, including automated interpretation and report
generation, and the current scalable capacity is more than 2000
samples/day. This allows databases to be efficiently and
cost-effectively generated using fresh or archived rock
material.
Although cuttings are the main feedstock for the process,
other rock material can be used, including the frequently
discarded residue from the Scratch or TSI instrument, which
produces continuous strength index measurements by cutting a
groove along the surface of core samples with a specialized
apparatus. This introduces a high resolution geomechanical
component to the workflow. Additionally, the automated
data backbone can be used as a screening tool to optimize
additional work, including petrology, mineralogy, geochemistry
and detailed geomechanics.
Automation of this process has significantly increased
consistency and interpretive certainty, and reduced turnaround
time as compared to manual approaches. More importantly,
demonstrable and measurable value has been established with this
process on both the conventional and unconventional side, and
for both exploration risk assessment and reservoir
characterization. The relatively quick turnaround time for these
analyses bridges the time and information gap between near-real
time analyses conducted at well site, and longer-term rock-based
analyses completed in the lab.
Impact of Experimental Studies on Unconventional Reservoir Mechanisms
Richard Rosen (RL Rosen Consulting)
Novel apparatuses have been developed to measure permeability
using steady- and unsteady- state methods on nano-Darcy (nD)
shale (source rock) using intact cylindrical samples returned to
isostatic effective reservoir stress. The steady-state method
uses a high pressure dual pump system using supercritical
fluids. High pressure supercritical fluids have low viscosity
and low compressibility. The effect of low viscosity fluid
results in measureable flow rates and the effect of low
compressibility fluid minimize unsteady-state transients thereby
reducing the amount of time required to achieve steady-state
equilibrium. Specially designed and configured pump systems,
seals and sleeves reduce leak rates to allow Darcy flow and
permeability determination below 1 nD. The unsteady-state method
is based upon standard designs but is optimized for small pore
volume. In this report we present a summary of over 200 such
permeability measurements. Permeability is observed to be
dependent on geologic parameters, such as, texture and
composition. Stress dependence, with hysteresis, is observed for
samples with and without fractures as is rate dependent skin (Forchheimer).
An interpretation model where matrix storage feeds a
progressively larger fracture network provides a logical basis
for a dual-porosity reservoir simulation model. This
dual-porosity model is used to understand the influence of
reservoir production parameters, such as choke management.
An additional observed effect is possibly related to pore
collapse and disconnection. Pores associated with organic matter
are softer than the surrounding mineral matrix. If these pores
have a sufficiently small throat diameter, it is not hard to
envision that they easily compact and close under increased
effective stress as the result of reservoir depletion.
Therefore, organic pore systems can become isolated unlike those
of a sponge where fluids remain in pressure communication at all
times. The implication of such pore isolation phenomena is that
fluid material balance is not preserved during production and
can contribute to large production decline rates.
Moving from Qualitative to Quantitative Geomechanical Models
Claudia Amorocho (Weatherford)
Geomechanics solutions offered in the industry cover a wide
spectrum, going from single well, log-based, uncalibrated
dynamic elastic properties calculations to fully calibrated
field studies. Understanding the differences among them is
essential to use the results correctly. Basic products are
considered useful to determine rock quality and define terms
such as “fracability” and “fracture potential”, however the
values obtained from such simple models should be used
cautiously when applied to different geomechanical models. On
the other end of the spectrum, full geomechanics studies are
focused on integrating log, core, and subsurface data to obtain
calibrated results. This sort of integrated study allows us to
move from a qualitative indication of “fracability” to a
calibrated estimation of the expected fracture geometry and
ultimately hydrocarbon production. This presentation will
review the stages in a standard geomechanical model and show how
the integration of core data, well logs and field measurements
can allow us to move from qualitative indicators to quantitative
models.
Part 1: Results from a Comparative Study of Core Analysis Procedures in Unconventional Tight Oil Rocks
Neil Fishman (PetroLogic Solutions, LLC)
Having previously encountered difficulty in obtaining good
quality core saturation analysis data using routine core
analysis (RCA) from low porosity/permeability rocks in the
Bakken and Three Forks Formations, North Dakota, a multi-lab
comparative study was undertaken to search for ways to improve
core analytical measurement approaches. This study was conducted
to understand and evaluate the various core analytical
approaches, methods and techniques being utilized by commercial
service laboratories on unconventional tight oil reservoirs,
particularly rocks containing hyper-saline brines. The primary
goal of this study was to determine which methods would be most
suitable and accurate for use on Bakken/Three Forks rocks.
This study evaluated and compared four different core
analytical saturation approaches using core plugs and crushed
rock analytical approaches. The four techniques conducted by the
three labs were:
- Dean Stark routine core analysis (RCA) strictly
following protocols outlined in API RP-40
- Crushed rock analysis (CRA) broadly following the
techniques outlined in GRI- 95/0496
- Crushed rock Retort using the individual lab protocols
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) on core plug used in
Dean Stark RCA method at native state and post-cleaning
conditions
Part 1 of this presentation will present the results of the
first three methods made by each of the labs. Results indicate
that Sw determinations were higher from CRA compared to RCA from
all labs. In addition, permeability measurements are generally
higher from RCA compared to CRA, although problems that
developed in core plugs may indeed be responsible for some of
the measured permeability. These results have led to a new
set of protocols and best practices for use on Bakken/Three
Forks cores. Part 2 of the presentation will cover the results
of the NMR measurements.
Part 2: Results from a Comparative Study of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Core Analysis Measurements in Unconventional Tight Oil Rocks
Gary Simpson (consultant)
Included in the comparative study of unconventional tight oil
core saturation measurement techniques presented in Part 1 of
this presentation, laboratory Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)
measurements techniques were evaluated. Each of the three core
analysis service companies participated in this study were
instructed to make native-state NMR measurements on each of the
routine core plugs prior to undergoing Dean Stark cleaning
processes and then repeat the measurements on the plug following
the completed Dean Stark cleaning processes.
Part 2 of the presentation will present the remarkable
results the data revealed in the comparative study using NMR
measurements. The main result coming from the study confirmed
that industry standard Dean Stark RCA cleaning processes did not
clean all fluids from these unconventional tight oil rocks. The
data also revealed that standard interpretation T2 cut-offs
typically used in NMR logs analysis to calculate clay bound
water (CBW) and free-fluid were incorrect. Lastly, the data
revealed that in the case of the Bakken/Three Forks petroleum
system that NMR log and core data must have a large hydrogen
index correction due to hyper-salinity of formation waters.
Finally, the comparative study has broadened our
understanding of errors which can occur in core measurements
associated with unconventional tight oil core samples. These
understandings are allowing the development of new core analysis
protocols that could potentially reduce the overall error of
petrophysical measurements in unconventional tight oil cores.
Visualization and Quantification of 3D Pore Networks using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM)
Michael Hoffman (AIM GeoAnalytics)
Imaging small micropores from core samples and cuttings is a
key building block for accurately evaluating the volumetric pore
space of a rock sample. Standard petrographic techniques have
limited value for micropore quantification due to the
interference of multiple crystallographic layers and limited
optical resolution. High-resolution imaging techniques, such as
SEM and micro-CT scanning have played a pivotal role in the
characterization of micropores, but theses imaging techniques
are destructive and/or they cannot easily obtain a wide field of
view of a sample, and thus often only image a very limited
number of pore types in a sample.
This study focuses on recent advances in the application of
confocal laser microscopy (CLSM) to image and characterize
geological samples with complex microscale porosity networks. In
the life sciences, CLSM is an established light microscopy
technique for imaging fluorescently labeled specimens with three
dimensional structure. In the geosciences CLSM has recently been
applied as a promising method for generating high-resolution 3D
datasets of pore networks in conventional and unconventional
reservoirs. CLSM has the unique capability of producing optical
sections of the specimen, a non-destructive imaging approach
which uses light, rather than a physical method, such as a
focused ion beam milling, to section the sample. These optical
sections are captured at a submicron scale down to the
resolution limit of CLSM of ~300 nm in the vertical direction
and ~ 200 nm in its horizontal direction. This high-resolution
3D imaging technique allows for the quantification of (micro-)
pore shapes and associated pore throat sizes over a wide field
of view in complex porous samples. One major shortcoming of CLSM
is the resolution limit of ~200 nm in the horizontal that
prevents the 3D imaging of pores below that size, and can lead
to diffusion of the signal in some areas. However, CLSM is a
promising tool that provides a fast and inexpensive analysis of
pore networks and can help to bridge the resolution gap between
standard petrographic microscopy and higher-resolution
techniques. This study discusses the technical and practical
aspects of CLSM with application to tight oil and gas
reservoirs.
|
|